Kerikeri David Collins for Dummies

Kerikeri David Collins for Dummies

Blog Article

In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia formerly operating under the name Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of unethical behavior that tarnishes personal and corporate reputations but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity .


Even amid the disturbing accusations, Collins has remained in his managerial role, apparently unscathed by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to testimonies from colleagues, Collins’ track record of misconduct started with violations of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left the workforce disheartened and stakeholders unsettled .


Amid a management development session — ostensibly intended to foster professional growth — David Collins allegedly exploited the session for unethical personal gains. It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , engaged in activities inconsistent with workplace policies, a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, a great read all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches went further than just personal misconduct. One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women —a gross breach of trust and confidentiality. His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including visual cues to hint at misconduct — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these online indiscretions , Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have pursued a workplace affair in defiance of company policies, despite both parties being in relationships . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but also had ramifications beyond just the corporate sphere.

How has this level of misconduct remained unchecked? What allows someone accused of repeated ethical breaches to remain in leadership? The explanation, it appears, highlights a systemic failure in oversight. Despite reports, no action has been taken against him.

This lack of oversight conveys a risky precedent : that certain employees remain untouchable despite egregious violations. It fosters a toxic corporate culture , creates a hostile work environment, and ultimately harms the company’s standing .